Dedy Tabrani

The Member of National Police Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-23

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The paper puts forward of approache which will help to promote Evidence Based Policy (EBP) in decision about of security policy.The aim of this paper is to identify lessons and approaches from EBP in developing democratic security. In a deliberative security framework, the policy formulation process not only emphasizes the protection and fulfillment of human rights, but also provides public space for society to be actively involved in the formulation and evaluation of policies in the security sector. This article uses the Evidence Based Policy (EBP) approach which to informs the policy process, rather than aiming to directly affect the eventual goals of the policy. Security is related to socio-political values and security is a process of negotiation and contestation, so a process involving society or deliberative security is needed.

KEYWORDS:

Security, Deliberative, Evidence Based Policy, police

REFERENCES
1) Brauch, H.G (2011), Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security: Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol 5,Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.

2) Chambers, S (2018). “The Philosophic Origins of the Deliberative Ideal,” in Andre Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark Warren (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

3) Davies (2004) ‘Is evidence-based government possible?’ Jerry Lee Lecture, presented at the 4th Annual Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Washington DC

4) Ehrenberg, J (1999) Civil society: the critical history of an idea, New York and London: New York University Press.

5) Flyvbjerg, B (2001) Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again, Cambridge, UK: University Press.

6) Habermas, J (1985). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society Beacon. Boston: Beacon Press, 1985.

7) Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norm: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

8) Habermas, J. “Popular Sovereignty as Procedure,” in James Bohman dan William Rehg, (eds), (1997). Deliberative Democracy:Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute.

9) Lasswell, H.D (1997), ‘The Politics of Prevention’, in Psychopathology and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

10) Marston, G. and Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the Evidence: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence Based Policy. The Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs. 3 (3). 143-163.

11) Morlino, L (2011). Changes for Democracy: Actors, Structures, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12) Pollard, A and Court, J (2005) ‘How Civil Society Organisations Use Evidence to Influence Policy Processes: A literature review’, ODI Working Paper 249, London: ODI.

13) Strauss, L and dan Cropsey, J. (1987). History of Political Philosophy. Chicago and London; The University of Chicago Press, 1987.

Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2023